Lab Study Compares Fat Tissue Preparations for Knee Cartilage Health

Researchers Test Three Methods for Processing Your Own Fat Tissue

Scientists at the University of Pittsburgh wanted to understand which fat tissue preparation works best for knee osteoarthritis. They tested three different methods in a laboratory setting. Each method processes fat tissue differently before it could potentially be injected into a damaged joint. Understanding these differences helps doctors choose the most effective treatment approach.

Cartilage Cells Respond Differently to Each Preparation

The research team used cartilage cells from two patients who had knee replacement surgery. They exposed these cells to three types of processed fat tissue:

• SVF (Stromal Vascular Fraction): Fat tissue broken down using enzymes

• Nanofat: Fat tissue squeezed through syringes to create tiny particles

• Lipogems®: Fat tissue processed through a specialized bead-mill device

Each preparation contains regenerative cells, but the processing method affects how those cells interact with damaged cartilage.

Enzyme-Processed Fat Increased Inflammation in Cartilage

The study revealed a surprising finding about SVF, the enzyme-digested preparation. Cartilage cells exposed to SVF showed higher levels of inflammatory markers. These cells also produced more enzymes that break down cartilage tissue. This happened at both the 36-hour and 72-hour testing points. Higher inflammation and breakdown activity could potentially worsen joint damage rather than help healing.

Mechanically Processed Fat Promoted Cartilage Rebuilding

Both nanofat and Lipogems® showed more favorable results. Cartilage cells exposed to these preparations:

• Showed minimal inflammatory response

• Increased production of healthy cartilage building blocks

• Demonstrated better balance between tissue breakdown and repair

This suggests that mechanical processing—using physical force rather than enzymes—preserves beneficial properties in the fat tissue.

Lipogems® Showed Most Consistent Regenerative Effects

While both mechanically processed preparations performed well, Lipogems® stood out for consistency. Nanofat produced temporary improvements in cartilage-building activity. However, Lipogems® maintained increased matrix synthesis at both study timepoints. Matrix synthesis means the cartilage cells were actively producing the structural proteins that make healthy cartilage strong and flexible. This sustained response suggests more reliable regenerative potential.

What This Laboratory Research Means for Patients

This study was conducted entirely in a laboratory, not in actual patients. Scientists grew cartilage cells in special gel beads to mimic natural conditions. They then observed how different fat preparations affected these cells over 36 to 72 hours. While laboratory studies cannot predict exactly what happens inside your body, they help researchers understand basic biological responses.

The findings suggest that how fat tissue gets processed matters significantly. Mechanical processing methods like Lipogems® may offer advantages over enzyme-based methods. The researchers noted that Lipogems® technology fragments fat tissue while preserving its natural structure. This keeps helpful cells like pericytes (cells that support blood vessel healing) and stem cells in their normal environment.

For patients considering regenerative treatments for knee osteoarthritis, this research provides encouraging laboratory evidence. It supports the use of mechanically processed fat tissue preparations. However, laboratory results need confirmation through clinical trials in actual patients. Talk with your doctor about whether Lipogems® treatment might be appropriate for your specific situation.

---

Source: Kokai et al., Stem Cells and Development, 2021.