Gender Differences in Knee Osteoarthritis Response to Fat-Based Treatment

Tiffanie-Marie Borg, Nima Heidari, Ali Noorani, Mark Slevin, Angela Cullen, Stefano Olgiati, Alberto Zerbi, Alessandro Danovi, Adrian Wilson · unknown · 2021

Women Show Greater Pain Relief Than Men After Two Years

A study of 386 patients with knee osteoarthritis found that women experienced significantly better outcomes than men following treatment with micro-fragmented adipose tissue (MFAT). This specially processed fat tissue from the patient's own body was injected into the knee joint. The research team designed their analysis specifically to account for gender differences—something many medical studies fail to do.

Both Genders Started With Similar Pain Levels

Before treatment, women and men reported comparable baseline scores for both pain and knee function. Researchers measured pain using a visual analogue scale (VAS), where patients rate discomfort from zero to ten. They also tracked function using the Oxford Knee Score (OKS), a questionnaire that assesses daily activities like walking, climbing stairs, and getting dressed. Starting from similar baselines allowed for fair comparison of how each group responded over time.

Study Tracked Nearly 400 Patients Over Two Years

The research included 192 women and 194 men who received MFAT injections for knee osteoarthritis. All patients had their condition confirmed through X-rays, and some also had MRI scans. The team excluded anyone with recent knee injuries, infections, or significant leg deformities. Patients were followed for two years, with pain and function scores collected at regular intervals.

Researchers Used Advanced Methods to Ensure Fair Comparison

The study authors noted that women are often underrepresented in medical research. This can lead to biased results that don't reflect real-world treatment responses. To address this, the team used specialized statistical software to balance the male and female groups. They also used sophisticated techniques to handle missing data—a common challenge in long-term studies when patients miss follow-up appointments.

What This Means for Your Treatment Decision

This research suggests that MFAT treatment may work differently depending on gender. The authors point to several possible reasons for this difference:

  • Hormonal factors: Women and men have different hormone levels that may affect how their bodies respond to regenerative treatments

  • Genetic differences: Sex-linked genes may influence healing and inflammation

  • Disease progression: Women often seek treatment at later stages of joint degeneration, which may affect how much improvement is possible

  • Environmental factors: Differences in activity levels and occupational demands between genders

The study confirms that MFAT is a safe treatment option for both women and men with knee osteoarthritis. However, it highlights the importance of considering individual factors when predicting treatment outcomes.

More Research Needed to Understand Gender Differences

The researchers call for additional studies to identify the molecular basis for why women and men respond differently to biologic treatments. Understanding these mechanisms could help doctors personalize treatment approaches. This might lead to modified protocols or combination therapies that optimize outcomes for all patients, regardless of gender.

If you're considering MFAT treatment for knee osteoarthritis, discuss these findings with your doctor. Your individual response may depend on many factors beyond gender, including your overall health, activity level, and the severity of your condition.

---

Source: Borg et al., unknown, 2021.

Original Publication

Gender-Specific Response in Pain and Function to Biologic Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis: A Gender-Bias-Mitigated, Observational, Intention-to-Treat Study at Two Years

Tiffanie-Marie Borg, Nima Heidari, Ali Noorani, Mark Slevin, Angela Cullen, Stefano Olgiati, Alberto Zerbi, Alessandro Danovi, Adrian Wilson · unknown · 2021

Knee osteoarthritis is a major cause of disability worldwide. Newer modalities of treatment with less morbidity, such as intra-articular injection of microfragmented fat (MFAT), are showing promise. We report on our novel observation that women show a greater improvement in pain and function to MFAT than men. Traditionally, women have been underrepresented in studies and studies with both sexes regularly fail to analyze the results by sex. To mitigate for this bias and quantify it, we describe a technique using reproducible statistical analysis and replicable results with Open Access statistical software R to calculate the magnitude of this difference. This observational, intention-to-treat study included 456 patients with knee osteoarthritis who received MFAT treatment. Patients were scored for pain using visual analogue scale (VAS) and function using Oxford knee score (OKS) at baseline and follow-up. Statistical analysis was performed using R software to address gender imbalance in the dataset (192 females versus 226 males). Results demonstrated that women showed significantly greater improvement in both pain and function compared to men following MFAT treatment. Genetic, hormonal, environmental, and age factors play a role in our observed difference between the sexes. There is a need for further studies to identify the molecular basis for this difference and be able to utilize it to improve outcome for both women and men.

Related Research