Micro-Fragmented Fat Shows Best Cartilage Protection in Knee Arthritis Study
Giuseppe Filardo, Matilde Tschon, Francesco Perdisa, Silvia Brogini, Carola Cavallo, Giovanna Desando, Gianluca Giavaresi, Brunella Grigolo, Lucia Martini, Nicolò Nicoli Aldini, Alice Roffi, Milena Fini, Elizaveta Kon · Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy · 2021
Three Fat-Based Treatments Compared Head-to-Head
Researchers wanted to know: what's the best way to use your own fat tissue to treat knee osteoarthritis? This animal study compared three different methods of preparing fat tissue for injection. The first method was micro-fragmentation (the Lipogems® approach). The second used chemical processing to break down fat tissue. The third expanded fat cells in a laboratory over two weeks. All three approaches aimed to deliver healing cells to damaged joints.
Study Created Real-World Arthritis Conditions
Scientists surgically created osteoarthritis in 48 rabbit knees. This mimics the cartilage breakdown and joint inflammation that humans experience. Two months after arthritis developed, each knee received one injection. Some knees got micro-fragmented fat. Others received chemically processed fat or lab-grown cells. A control group received either saline or no treatment. Researchers then examined the joints at two and four months after treatment.
All Three Methods Proved Safe for Joint Injection
Good news emerged on the safety front. None of the three fat-based treatments caused harmful reactions. Blood tests and joint fluid analysis showed no concerning inflammation. All methods produced tissue samples with 85 to 95 percent viable (living) cells. This confirms that each processing approach delivers active biological material to the joint.
Micro-Fragmented Fat Protected Cartilage Best
Here's where the differences appeared. Joints treated with micro-fragmented fat showed significantly better cartilage quality. The cartilage surface was smoother. The tissue staining was more uniform, suggesting healthier structure. Most importantly, the scientific scoring system (called the Laverty score) showed statistically significant improvement. Micro-fragmented fat outperformed both the chemically processed version and the lab-expanded cells.
Joint Lining Also Showed Positive Signs
The synovium (the tissue lining the joint) showed encouraging results too. Knees treated with micro-fragmented fat had fewer signs of synovitis (joint lining inflammation). While this finding didn't reach statistical significance, it suggests additional protective benefits. Healthy synovium matters because ongoing inflammation drives arthritis progression.
Why Micro-Fragmentation May Work Better
The researchers believe minimal processing preserves the natural healing environment. Fat tissue contains pericytes (cells that support blood vessel repair) and mesenchymal stem cells. These cells work together within a supportive tissue structure. Micro-fragmentation keeps this network intact.
Chemical digestion and lab expansion, by contrast, break apart this natural architecture. Lab-grown cells also carry risks. Extended cultivation can cause cells to lose their healing abilities or develop genetic changes. Additionally, lab expansion requires two separate procedures and specialized facilities.
What This Means for Patients Considering Treatment
This preclinical study supports micro-fragmented adipose tissue as a promising approach for knee osteoarthritis. The Lipogems® method showed the best cartilage protection among the three techniques tested. It's also the simplest approach—completed in one procedure without chemical processing or weeks of laboratory work.
Remember that animal studies represent an early research stage. However, these findings align with growing clinical evidence in humans. The study helps explain why micro-fragmentation may offer advantages over more complex processing methods. For patients seeking regenerative options, this research adds scientific support for the tissue-preserving approach.
---
Source: Filardo et al., Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2021.
Original Publication
Micro-fragmentation is a valid alternative to cell expansion and enzymatic digestion of adipose tissue for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis: a comparative preclinical study
Giuseppe Filardo, Matilde Tschon, Francesco Perdisa, Silvia Brogini, Carola Cavallo, Giovanna Desando, Gianluca Giavaresi, Brunella Grigolo, Lucia Martini, Nicolò Nicoli Aldini, Alice Roffi, Milena Fini, Elizaveta Kon · Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy · 2021
Adipose-derived cells have shown promise for treating osteoarthritis (OA), but different processing methods exist. This preclinical study compared three adipose tissue processing approaches: mechanical micro-fragmentation (MF), enzymatic digestion to obtain stromal vascular fraction (SVF), and cell expansion to obtain adipose-derived stromal cells (ADSCs). Biological samples were first characterized in vitro, with all three methods yielding 85-95% viable cells. An in vivo rabbit OA model was established through bilateral anterior cruciate ligament transection. Two months post-surgery, rabbits received intra-articular injections: Group 1-controls (untreated/saline, 24 knees), Group 2-MF (24 knees), Group 3-SVF (24 knees), Group 4-ADSCs (24 knees). Animals were euthanized at 2 and 4 months post-treatment for macroscopic, histological, histomorphometric, immunohistochemical, and biochemical analyses. Results demonstrated no significant adverse effects or inflammatory responses across all treated groups. Macroscopic scores showed no significant differences between treated and control groups. However, MF demonstrated the most promising outcomes, particularly in protecting articular cartilage from OA degeneration, with superior qualitative and semi-quantitative evaluations (Laverty score, p=0.004), more uniform staining, smoother surface, and reduced synovitis signs. The findings suggest MF represents a valid, safe alternative to enzymatic digestion and cell expansion for OA treatment.